Association de Sauvegarde duCHATEAU DE GAVRAY |
Other buildings |
4 – Room C |
4.1 Exposed Structures |
It is a regular looking piece, roughly rectangular, measuring 5m20/5m30 by 6m35/6m40:
|
The left right foot of the door is composed of well-cut stones, which terminate the east wall of the room, behind which a rounded space appears to be the site of a wooden post. To the right of this threshold, there is no right foot: the south wall of the room extends uninterruptedly to the east.
|
4.2 Excavation |
The only layer of occupation observed is located in the southeast corner, at the level of the shale sill, it was found to be very thin. It contained charcoal and traces of unpreserved metal objects. The only material consisted of four, very small, potsherds, three of which were made of sandstone. The thinness of the layer and the poverty of its contents make it possible to imagine that the floor of the room was kept very clean. The paving tiles found in large quantities in the upper levels undoubtedly come from a nearby level or building. |
The support of this very hard layer, over the whole piece, revealed new stones (some of which seemed to be bound to the mortar) and slabs of schist, in the center of the room. It was becoming more and more obvious that there were the remains of a flattened building. The layer of silty earth, whose colour was not homogeneous, then appeared as a filling of the room, intended to bring the floor to the level of the levelling of the wall.Probably only the base remained, and the occupation layer had only been preserved in the south-east corner, under a large pile of material that had already protected the plaster on the east wall. |
|
The two levelled walls, seen from the east |
In the south-east corner, between two layers of clay, a fragment of a mortar slab remained, which slightly covered the last stones, to the south, of the north-south levelled wall (traces of masonry work at this level). It should be noted that all the layers excavated in the south-east corner, with the exception of the humus layer, were broken at the edge of the south wall, 0.60 m from it. At that time, there was only a filling of stones. |
|
Level walls: one arch is clearly visible to the south (another arch to the north disappears under the wall of room C) |
After the loam soil had been completely removed, it became possible to understand the previous layout of the space over the entire room. |
5 – The earlier buildings in room C |
|
An east-west wall, not attached to the previous one, but glued to it. Without foundations, it rests directly on the silt layer, and only a foundation of stones remains. It stops in the west, a few inches from the west wall of the room. These walls therefore separate the interior space of this room into several distinct areas.
|
|
The great east-west wall, seen from its western end. The buildings to the north are attached to it |
It then becomes interesting to look at this wall, from the other side, i.e. from room A: here we find the two constructions observed in the next room. It can also be seen that where the wall is thickest, it belongs to the same construction as the north-south levelled wall. Here's what forces us to look at these buildings in a completely different way:
|
6 – The north-east corner of the enclosure |
The north-east corner of the enclosure appeared as a vast rounded dome, too large to be merely the collapse of the surrounding wall, but impossible to identify as a building. After levelling this dome, to a depth of almost one metre, at its greatest height, no stratigraphy appeared. It was, without a doubt, a thick layer of demolition, consisting of stones of various sizes, irregularly shaped, and quite small on the whole. Rare shards (sandstone), fragments of tiles, roofing shale and cobblestones were the only material. |
The appearance of a layer of earth and the excavation undertaken provided two surprises:
|
|
The north-east corner of the enclosure, at the end of the excavation (latrines, courtyard, perimeter wall) |
7 – The stair tower |
It is a small rectangular building (D) measuring 2.50 m by 2.70 m. It is attached to the south-west wall, without being attached to it. It was accessed from room C by a shale sill. |
A winding staircase led to a higher floor, but it is impossible to know which building it served. The location of the first steps is clearly discernible, but the masonry is too damaged to be able to discern the next ones. |
|
Staircase D, as seen from Room C |
8 – Latrine |
It is a small rectangular building (E) with external dimensions of 2m50 x 1m70 and interior dimensions of 1mx1m40. It is leaning against the east-west wall, which has a fairly large fruit.It has been thoroughly excavated: the bottom is made up of a flat, very hard floor, gravel bound with mortar, 1.50 m below the level of the walls. |
The north wall has an opening 60 cm wide and 80 cm high, well delineated by three large cut stones. The dimensions of the recess, its position outside a building, its opening at the base and finally its concretions, seem to indicate the use of latrines. It should be noted, however, that the building is not directly related to the outside of the enclosure. These latrines, along with the stairwell, served the second floor of Building AB, on which they are located. |
The background was very rich in objects:
|
|
The Latrine window |
According to Messrs. Ozouf and Coutard: " When viewed with binoculars, the coating appears as a kind of dark brown resin with small amber areas containing woody plant debris and elements of animal origin such as small chrysalises. The resin encompasses a coarse sand. There seems to have been an evolution of organic matter in a humid and confined environment."The size of the recess, its position outside a building, the opening at the base and finally these concretions, seem to indicate the use of latrines. It should be noted, however, that the walls bear no traces, and that the building is not in direct relation to the outside of the enclosure. The objects, in particular the glass-goblet and the ridge tile, give the end of the fifteenth or sixteenth century as a probable date. This dating is consistent with the one provided by the token, on the floor of Coin B. |
9 – Between the stair tower and the latrine |
|
10 – Between the latrine and the perimeter wall |
|
There was a contribution of waste, the containers were apparently not broken on the spot, unlike those found in the latrines. The excavation stopped at a softer silty layer with traces of charcoal. |
Appendix: The Conclusion of the 1989 Excavation Report |
"As we had anticipated, we have a large residential area here, which has been developed in succession.
|
Excavation is to continue in this part of the site, in order to clarify a number of points that remain unclear. |