Association de Sauvegarde du

CHATEAU DE GAVRAY

THE NAVARRESE FORTRESS

The Hundred Years' War, which broke out at the time, was the period when the Château de Gavray played its most important role. The region was at the heart of the conflict and the fortress saw a succession of Navarrese, French and then English occupiers. The castle was besieged and twice taken by French troops during this conflict. For the historian, this was a prosperous period thanks to the Accounts of the King of Navarre, which detail with great precision the expenditure on supplies, the wages allocated to the soldiers, the state of the food reserves, etc...

The Succession of Louis X le Hutin

Jeanne, daughter  of Louis X le Hutin and Margaret of Burgundy, was removed from the crown of France in 1316, on the death of her brother, John the Posthumous, who lived only five days. The Estates-General, convened in 1317, stripped her of her rights by virtue of the principle of masculinity created for the occasion. Her uncle, Philip the Long, became king and granted her an annuity of 15,000 livres and she had to ratify in her twelfth year (in 1324) a treaty that disinherited her from Navarre and the counties of Champagne and Brie that she had held from her grandmother, Jeanne de Navarre, wife of Philip the Fair.

 
 
Joan II of Navarre (Book of Hours of Joan of Navarre).
 

When she came of age, Joan did not confirm her renunciation, she married Philippe d'Evreux, son of the second brother of Philip the Fair. On the accession of Philip VI in 1328, she claimed her inheritance. It obtained Navarre but definitively lost the counties of Champagne and Brie in exchange for the county of Angoulême and possessions in Normandy, including the county of Mortain.

What happened to Gavray, which was not part of the county of Mortain?

According  to Charles De Gerville (1):  "In 1328, Gavray was ceded to Jeanne, Queen of Navarre" as an indemnity. This assertion is taken up by Gustave Renault (2) and Bernard Beck (3) who specify that this was done at the end of an exchange with the King of France.Moreover, there were relations between the castle of Mortain and that of Gavray, at least this is what emerges from the homage lige of  Philippe paid to his father Philippe Augustein 1220, where Gavray and Mortain are mentioned together as remaining in the king's hand. Finally, an indication is given for 1351 by the  "Gallia Regia" (4) a certain Jean Roussel was ordained ...... to the custody of the chastel of Mortain and Gavray. The presence of the same captain at the head of these two fortresses proves that they are under the same authority.

 

Charles II of Navarre

 

said the Bad
King of Navarre
Count of Evreux

When Joan of Navarre died in 1349, she  was succeeded by her son Charles. King of Navarre (by his mother), Count of Evreux (by his father) and holder of some lordships in Normandy, he can also, very legitimately, claim the throne of France. An unscrupulous man, for whom the end justifies the means, he takes over his mother's claims (possession of the county of Angoulême promised but never given) thus reinforcing his many grievances against his stepfather John the Good (in particular the non-payment of his wife's dowry).

A coin of John II the Good, "Blanc au châtel fleur-de-lis" (1356). Two of these coins were found at the castle site. John the Good, King of France from 1350 to 1364, had married his daughter to Charles II the Bad, King of Navarre. This marriage did not prevent hostilities between France and Navarre, hostilities at the heart of which was the castle of Gavray.
obverse reverse

Finally, his grievances were exacerbated when the king of France assigned to his favorite Charles of Spain, constable of France, the county of Angoulême which was to belong to him. On 8 January 1354, the constable was assassinated at L'Aigle by the Navarrese.

John  the Good ordered  all the lands and castles belonging to his son-in-law to be "put under the roof".

 

Taking the lead, Charles negotiated with Edward III of England. At the same time, his brother, Philippe, Count of Longueville, together with Godfrey d'Harcourt, Lord of Saint-Sauveur, raised troops in the Cotentin. They had assembled "a large number of men-at-arms, and Monseigneur Godefroy had the steps of the Clos du Cotentin driven in." (5)
Faced with this Anglo-Navarrese threat, the King of France prefers to negotiate, it is the  "Treaty of Mantes" of February 22, 1354. By this treaty, Charles obtained the county of Beaumont le Roger and the greater part of the Cotentin, becoming master of half of Normandy.

Double game of the kings of France, England and Navarre

Twenty-five years of intrigues, conspiracies and apparent reconciliations, the story  of Charles II is a bit of a story of missed opportunities. Beyond the simple concern of enlarging his possessions in the kingdom, was his design to make the English cause triumph, or was it to supplant the Valois himself, on account of the dynastic rights which he held from his mother? More likely, he thought of swerving between the two adversaries in order to better consolidate his position. Behind him was formed a whole party, consisting of nobles, who may or may not be his vassals, clerics and burghers, who may or may not have been his subjects, all of whom, indisposed by the abuses of the monarchical administration, doubtless saw in Charles a useful counterpoise to the omnipotence of the organs of the Valois government. (6)

After the Treaty of Mantes, Charles went to Avignon where extensive French concessions to the English were to be ratified. Not content with reneging on these concessions, John the Good took advantage  of Charles' voyage to try to reconquer the lands of the King of Navarre in Normandy. Only six strongholds did not surrender: Evreux, Pont-Audemer, Cherbourg, Avranches, Mortain and Gavray.

"In the year aforesaid, the King of Paris and went to Normandy and fled to Caan, and made him take and put all the lands of the said King of Navarre into his hands, and institute officers of the said King of Navarre and put guards in the chasteaux of the said King of Navarre, except in VI, that is to say, (cf. supra) which were not returned; for he had some Navarrese who replied to those whom the kings sent thither that they would not return them to the king of Navarre, their lord, who had bailed them in their custody." (7)

 
Jean II le Good

Meanwhile, Charles met in Avignon  with Henry of Lancaster, grandson  of Henry III  of England, to arrange a partition of France. He returned to Cherbourg in 1355 and awaited the planned English landing. As the latter is not forthcoming, Charles negotiates... with the French. This was the Treaty of Valognes on 10 September 1355.

Coat of arms of Henry of Lancaster

By this treaty, Charles agreed to make obedience to the King of France, his overlord, for the castles that had not wanted to surrender. The king may appoint the captains of his choice, until Charles has done homage:

"until we in our person have done at Mons. The King's obedience below is written." (8)

This clause renders this treaty purely formal, since homage will be paid a few days later and Charles will keep his property. The Treaty of Valognes did not settle matters between the French and Navarrese for long.

Charles was arrested in Rouen in 1356 by John the Good. This arrest provoked an uprising led by  Philippe d'Evreux, the king's brother, and Godfrey d'Harcourt. (9) The Navarrese took the fortress of Hambye, among other places, and a chronicle mentions a clash between the French and the Navarrese between Gavray and Hambye. (10) These clashes were to be frequent.

 
Arrest of Charles II
 

In 1360, by the Treaty of Brétigny-Calais, Edward III undertook to abandon the fortresses occupied by his troops in the part of the kingdom remaining to the Valois. One exception, however, was the powerful castle of Saint-Sauveur-le-Vicomte, the former possession of Godefroy d'Harcourt, which he entrusted to Jean Chandos. Edward did not evacuate his places, confining himself to disavowing the troops who occupied them. It is therefore necessary to proceed with their "vuidement".

Charles took advantage of this period to establish his power in Normandy. In 1360, he was at Mortain  on 28 June, at Gavray on 28 July from where he sent urgent recommendations to the governors of his castles and fortresses for their defence, at Valognes on 13 August, from 27 August to 25 September at Cherbourg, and then again at Gavray  on 6 October. (11)

The following year, we find him:

 

-from 9 May to 5 June in Avranches,
-June 10 in Gavray,
- 18 and 19 June in Cherbourg,
- 24 and 25 June in Valognes,
-September 14 in Cherbourg
-and, from 1 to 18 October, again in Gavray. (12)

Negotiations with the English probably justified these moves, since they gave up their forts on the coast: Graffart and Barfleur to him for payment.

The big companies

The war was temporarily interrupted, and the country was infested with bands of idle mercenaries who formed companies. (13) These Companies were made up of uprooted soldiers, unwilling or unable to return to their homes and/or the Society, and as a result of a military organization which provided only for afew months' pay between two de jure or de facto truces, at the end of which the combatants were sent back, with the exception of those destined to guard the frontiers. This phenomenon is exacerbated by social unrest and economic crises.

 
 

The region  of Gavray suffered, like so many others, from this scourge often mentioned in the accounts of the King of Navarre and the castle played its part in the fight against these Companies. It includes:

"For the expenses of Monseigneur d'Avranches, lieutenant of Monseigneur le Captal, his men and horses, as long as he was dying at the chastel  of Gavray for the siege of La Rochelle... Item "to make bread for the said seat.... Half a pot of sound carried to the said seat for the machines... "I am not sure (14)

This is "La Rochelle" in Avranchin, now called "La Rochelle Normande", occupied by the English. This see is mentioned again on 19 September 1373, in a letter from Robert Porte, bishop of Avranches (15):

"Robert, by the grace of God, bishop of Avranches, to all those who... We are sufficiently satisfied that for the time that we and others of the people of the King of Navarre, my most dreaded lord, were at the siege which by the people of my said lord was made in front of La Rochelle in Avranchin, we ordered at Gavrai, for the necessity of the said siege, two engines with rope, four iron pulleys,  a jar of healthy and a tresclou... »

Thus, Gavray had not only lent his walls, but had also participated in the siege by providing two catapults with their accessories.

 

To fight against the Companies, often French and Navarrese united. Thus, from 19 to 23 April 1363, Philippe de Navarre, brother  of Charles II, Count of Longueville, stayed in Gavray, as part of a joint operation with the Duke of Normandy, the future Charles V. (16)

Coat of arms of Philippe de Navarre, Count of Longueville

An extraordinary confusion reigned in Lower Normandy where troops circulated in all directions. Coutances, was most often Navarrese, but sometimes occupied by the people of the King of France. Saint-Lô was French, Torigny Navarrese. The centre of resistance of King Charles the Bad was Gavray, whose  "formidable fortifications, the boulevard of the Prince's power in the Bocage, kept away all plans of attack" according to Onfroy de Tracy. The Anglo-Navarrese had captured Saint-Denis-le-Gast and Hambye, and defended Mortain and Valognes:
- Guillaume de la Haye was captain of the castle of Valognes,
- Olivier de Mauny, captain of the fortress of Carentan,
- Guillaume de Manneville, captain of the Château de Chanteloup,
- Baudet de Saint Paul, captain of the Bastide des Ponts d'Ouve, replaced in 1363 by Guillaume aux Epaules, who then became captain of the town and castle of Gavray.

Guerrilla warfare persists and insecurity reigns everywhere. In 1364, Louis, another brother  of Charles II, stayed in Gavray with his men and Pierre Clémence, the treasurer notes that 8 quarters of wheat "were lost at the mill of Quetreville by the English who took it". (17)

In 1366, it was necessary to "vuider" other forts, and the bishop of Avranches was again at Gavray:

"despens des chevaulx de Monseigneur d'Avranches, as much as he fled to Gavray for the parliament of the king's people our lord on the vuidement of Carentan, Tinchebray, Saint-Sever and other fortresses... ". (18)

The Peninsular War, to which the Companies under the command of Bertrand DuGuesclin were sent, did not resolve the issue, since in 1367-1368, new bands were rampant in the region. Bretons settled in Champeaux and Genêts, and ransomed the country. As if to fight against the Companies a few years earlier, Monseigneur d'Avranches settled in Gavray. Guillaume Le Marié, guard of the garrisons of the chastel of Gavray, had to deliver foodstuffs:

"for the government of the said lord of Avranches and his people, lying at Gavray, from the Tuesday after the feast of St. Vincent, that the Bretons came to Champeaulz to make war on the country of Monseigneur, until the twenty-seventh day of March last past." (19)

This struggle was very expensive, as evidenced by the accounts: additional soldiers had to be paid, troops had to be maintained, etc. so much so that, as G. Dupont remarks  : "fifteen years later, the financial implications of the operation had only just been liquidated... ». (20) If the castle is put in a state of defence, so is the town of Gavray. This is, a priori, the only period (1366 to 1369) in which the presence of a military leader is reported in each of the places:

 "Etienne Viguereux, captain of the chastel of Gavray"  and "Jehan de Savoye, connestable establi à la garde de la ville de Gavray". (21)

In the summer of 1368:

"XII men-at-arms (are) sent by Monseigneur the Captal to Gavray(22) for the defence of the said town and all the surrounding country, who were there in the space of XXVIII days in August and September, or at what time the people of a road of the grant company took the town of the castle of Vire". (23)

In September, the Captal

"Lessa en la ville de Gavray VIII vallés et IX chevals". (24)

In October, he recruited new men-at-arms:

A. Janicoiz, Verny de Cadillac, le Wolpat, Eliot, Lespessat, Jehanno and Jehan Duchemin, men-at-arms who Monseigneur le Captal ordered to be and die at Gavray by way of digging at X fr. per month each (...) their fu poié for their dis gaiges served by the said chastel and the town of Gavray, for the months of October, November, December, January,  February and March CCCLXVIII, April, May, July, July CCCLIX, and of the month of August following until the tenth day, which is the third of the month, einsi make X month and the third of a month, LXX fr. for month (...) ». (25)

The Franco-Navarrese mutual assistance in dealing with the Companies did not, however, improve relations between the two sovereigns.

 

Charles V decided to reconquer his territory. The English renunciations provided for at Calais had still not been exchanged, and the King of France had reason to declare hostilities. The Place de St-Sauveur would be affected by this reconquest. The King of Navarre then preferred to return to Normandy. Leaving his retreat in Navarre, he returned to the Cotentin, sought to negotiate  with Charles V, and then with Edward III, who rebuffed his advances.

Charles V 

In 1369, he stayed in Cherbourg  "with his commons" from August to December

"  except for the last two days that the common man went to Gavray and Monseigneur died at Cherbourg." (26)

In 1370, he remained in Cherbourg,

« les gens et chevaliers de Monseigneur estans à Gavray depuis premier de janvier CCCLIX jusques au VIIe jour de may CCCLXX ».(27)

Deeds attest to the king's presence at Gavray  on 1 October 1370 on his return from a trip to England to prepare  a treaty with Edward III, a treaty refused by the Prince of Wales (the Black Prince).


Turning to the King of France, he concluded peace in March 1371. The captains of certain Norman places which he had pledged to cede refused to abandon them. (28)

A deed signed on 24 April 1371 is the last trace of the king's visit to Gavray. (29)

The castle during the Navarra occupation

Nothing in the texts allows us  to imagine what the castle was like during this occupation and nothing in the accounts we have allows us to affirm that no significant changes took place between 1363 and 1371. We know that it has, among other things:
-and donjon 1123,
- a barbican 1199,
- a drawbridge restored in 1199,
- a chapel,
- a large room 1199,
- two 1199 gates, one of which is a gate-tower,
- Battlements: 8 built in 1199.......
- a cistern 1321-1324
- various houses,
- attics,
- housing for soldiers,
- a kitchen.
Given the number of people sometimes housed in the castle and the size of the garrison, one can imagine a large number of buildings within the walls. There is no detail that allows us to understand them better.

The Defense of the Castle

The number of people in charge of the defence of the castle is not known for all periods, but in addition to the captain and the guard of the garrisons, the following figures can be found:
- in 1369 at the beginning of August: under the command of Jehannico Ruiz d'Ayvar 3 men-at-arms and 18 servants,
- end of August: 2 men-at-arms and 20 servants and a constable for the town of Gavray.
- in 1370: 3 men-at-arms and 20 servants (30).

These figures may vary in times of crisis, but they are in line with those of other strongholds in the region, of the same size, only Cherbourg had 45 servants but only 3 men-at-arms. The guard of the castle was reinforced by adding the following services:

"  of an eschauguete, which Monseigneur ordena estre on account of the wars in his chastel  of Gavray, to see and look about the country, by which men of arms or others could not come properly without being apperceuz". (31)

 

To be useful, this service had to warn the men-at-arms and the population as soon as possible, which is why the castle was equipped with a bell:

"To ring and ring, however, that the said eschauguete would see men-at-arms or other men on horseback coming, by which the ploughmen or others who were lorry could retire safely senz estre seurprins".(32)

Example of eschauguette construction

Stewardship

 To prevent any siege, each castle had a "garrison" duly supplied and whose accounts were closely monitored. Here is what the garrison of the castle consisted of when Guillaume Le Marié, guard of the garrisons of the chastel of Gavray, took over from Jean Latour:

"CXIIII quarters and a half of wheat, XV quarters of beans, XII quarters and a half of pitch, XVI quarters of barley, XXVIII quarters and a half of oats, CXXI fliche of bacon, half a pippe of verjuice of grain, LIX1 of sain, item XLII 1.de healthy, XVIII pos of old burre of VII years melted and put into a poicon for honey to keep,  an iron chain, an iron bar weighing about half a hundred, a baignouoire vat, hemp IIIIXXVI 1., II rope ladders, a rope of then, a chaable of rope for the tower, a chaable of grant engine, a bastard rope of sixteen fathoms, II ropes for vans to cover, III castings for engines, IIII chevestres for gear,  a fathom of fine rope, II small chevestres, a little horse-hide, III esseulx of iron for engines, IX pulleys of iron for engines, V pegs of iron for pulleys, XII lanterns, a line nail, a little crown nail for engines, VIIIXX 1. of tallow for candles, resin pitch XXV 1., black pitch XV 1., a pippe of salt containing III quarters II bushels and XI quarters II bushels of oats".

To which will be added each year foodstuffs from

"of the Viscount of Coutances", of several towns of the Viscounty of Coutances, of the 1-year-old raencons CCCLXIIII etc ... ». (33)

The beverage, on the other hand, can be found in the regular supplies. At the end of the same account, we find:

"a barrel of Gascoigne wine, three barrels of Spanish wine, a barrel of Poitou wine, a box of guernaiche, XIX pippes of wine from Païz, II pippes of Anjou wine, XXXV barrels of sidra... ».

There was no shortage of wine, it was transported through the port of Regnéville. As for cider, it is believed that it was introduced by the Navarrese people.

Finally, as far as domesticity is concerned, which is numerous during the visits of the "greats", under the orders of the Monseigneur's master dostel, the offices of: paneterie, deschanconnerie, cuisine, sausserie, etc. "I am not sure (34)

These accounts to which we referred stop in 1371 and we know no more about the castle until 1378, date of its reconquest by the king of France, except the name of its captain in 1377: Loppe Gil.

The French Reconquest

The reconquest led by Charles V, with the help of Du Guesclin,  continued.

"The constable . . . being occupied in Poitou and Brittany, Charles V charged Admiral John of Vienne (...) who "attacked the main English base of operations, Saint-Sauveur-le-Vicomte."

Large subsidies voted by the States of Normandy made it possible to assemble a large army and a strong artillery made in Saint-Lô and Caen, partly with iron from the Norman mines. The place surrendered for compensation on 3 July 1375 and the English re-embarked at Carteret. (35)

It is now a question of attacking and defeating the Navarrese fortresses.
P. Contamine sums up the circumstances of the French reconquest as follows: "In March 1378, the arrest of a familiar of the King of Navarre revealed his plan to poison Charles V. His intrigues with the King of England and the Duke of Brittany were revealed. Immediately, an army was assembled under the command of the Duke of Burgundy, who seized the fortresses of Charles the Bad without much resistance. (36)

This is where the episode of the heroic resistance of Gavray takes place, which gave rise to many more or less disputed versions, including those of
 C. de Gerville: "les abbayes et anciens châteaux de la Manche" pages 322-323
G. Renault: "Annuaire...  page 80
L. Delisle: "fragments of an unpublished chronicle relating to military events in Normandy from 1353 to 1389, Annuaire de la Manche, Saint-Lô 1895
"Chronique du Mont-St-Michel", published by Siméon Luce, Paris 1879 tome I page 11
Jean d'Orronville dit Cabaret:  "La chronique du bon duc Loys de Bourbon" Ed. 1876 of which we publish the extract in appendix.

The Siege of Gavray

Ferrando d'Ayens was considered sometimes as counsellor to the king of Navarre, sometimes as governor of his lands in Normandy. A heroic soldier, he showed  unfailing loyalty and devotion to Charles the Bad. On the approach  of Du Guesclin, he left Evreux to shut himself up in the castle of Gavray. He knew that this fortress contained his master's treasures and everything that was most dear to his heart. Finally, and this was to be considered, Gavray was considered to be "the most beautiful castle in Normandy" and  "to be impregnable from the assault of men-at-arms, all artillery and all machines".

 

The siege began at the beginning of May, led  by Bertrand Du Guesclin accompanied by the Duke of Burgundy and the Duke of Bourbon. It seems that  Charles of Navarre'  s son, Charles, was part of the expedition, to urge the captains not to resist, but there is no evidence of his presence. (37)

"The elevated place where the fortress was built, surrounded by two rivers, isolated on all sides except towards sunset where it was connected with the high hill of the Lande by a narrow isthmus, defended at its extremity by two towers, a trench, and dominated in the rear by the large entrance tower, made the approaches difficult. Batteries of bombards placed on the slope of the Lande and on the height of the Bains to the south, could have beaten the thick walls of the towers and the keep. But the newly invented artillery still played a secondary part in the attack on the places, and the old machines, battering rams, rolling towers, and catapults were still the most formidable weapons in the hands of the assailants. These machines could not be used against a castle reputed to be impregnable. It was necessary to rely exclusively on the ardour of the assailants, their patience, the surprises, and finally the discouragement of a garrison whose hope of relief had been taken away. ».

Du Guesclin had bastides (entrenched camps) built on either side of the castle, to finally send to Caen to fetch a bricole (catapult) unless it was a cannon since it was made precisely in Caen. (38) The transport required three days and several wagons of 6 horses each and carts of 4 horses. (39)

 

On 7 May, the Duke of Burgundy granted two soldiers a remission in front of Gavray. (40) On 12 May, eight squires were received at Gavray. (41) They were added to the troops already present: at least thirty crossbowmen. (42)

 

It is after this that the episode so celebrated by local historians takes place: the heroic resistance of Gavray, which owed its fall only to an unfortunate accident that happened to its governor, Ferrando d'Ayens. The latter, while visiting a tower where the powder was stored, is said to have caused a terrible explosion with his torch, hastening the surrender of the Navarrese garrison of the castle.

On May 31, the castle fell

On 1 June, Du Guesclin granted letters of remission to all Navarrese in the castle's garrison, a copy of which can be found at the end of manuscript 3141 of the Arsenal. These letters had been promised to them at the time of the capitulation. The defenders of the castle had obtained what we now call the honours of war, a preferential treatment justified in every respect both by their courage and by the importance of the walls which sheltered them and made them invulnerable.

The king appointed Jehan de Couvran, governor of the castle, then of Beauté-sur-Marne, who instructed

"Fouquet Tribout, receiver in the ancient viscounty of Coustances of the aids newly placed and ordered in the country of Normandy for the payment of the men-at-arms who are now there" to pay 200 gold francs to Nicolas Marie, viscount of Coutances, to whom the king had given them "  for consideration of the paines te travaulx that he has had and supported for the fact of the siege that he has put before Gavray". (43)

On the same day, we have a mandate from Bertrand Du Guesclin to Fouquet Tribout to pay 15,300 gold francs  to Symon Paien "for the finance in cash gold of the tower of the castle of Gavray, according to the treaty made with him at the time of the surrender of Gavray ". (44) On the 1st of June, the sum was given to Simon Paien at the castle of Gavray.

The following month, by a deed dated 14 July 1378, Charles V ordered the demolition of the fortresses taken from the Navarrese people: Pont-Audemer, Orbec, Breteuil, Rugles, Mortain, Avranches and Gavray. It was probably at this time that the round tower (the foundations of which were found next to the current keep) was destroyed, as well as part of the surrounding wall and a number of buildings.

In 1390, troops commanded by Thomas Graffart, on behalf of the King of France, razed what remained of the fortifications and everything that could contribute to the defense of the castle. In the comments of his unpublished chronicle of the fourteenth century published in 1895, Léopold Delisle shows the extent to which the Norman nobility was divided between the King of France and the King of Navarre:

"Gavray was besieged during the month of May. On the 31st of this month, Charles V, King of France, made 600 gold francs pay 600 gold francs to 6 knights: Guillaume Paisnel, Sire de Hambye, Alain de la Houssaie, Alain de Beaumont, Perceval d'Esneval, Raoul de Beauchamp and Hervé de Mauny, as a reward for their services in front of the chastel of Gavray.

Appendix

Extract relating to the capture of the castle of Gavray from the disputed chronicle of  "Du bon duc Loys de Bourbon" by Jean d'Orronville dit Cabaret published by the Société de l'Histoire de France by A.M. CHAZAUD on April 4, 1876.

 

"...And in the following month of March, the dukes of Burgundy, Bourbon, the conestable, and their company set out to ride into Normandy, or county of Evreux, the land of the king of Navarre, before Mortaigne, a very chastel and beautiful town, and within thirteen days after they besieged it, took the town by assault, and also the chastel, where they gained many goods. Thence the lords parted, and went before the city of Evreux, where there was a captain for the king of Navarre, called Ferrandon, who did not dare to trust himself to remain at Evreux, when he saw the lords approaching all their ost to besiege the city. He left everything, and fled hastily to Gavré, the castle where was the treasure of the King of Navarre, his master. And ceulx of the city, who saw their captain depart from eulx, made obedience, and gave the city back to the lords for the king of France. And from the town of Evreux departed the Duke of Burgundy, who departed, on account of the army which he was to make in England. And the Duke of Bourbon, the conestable, and the admiral went to their men before Gavré, the most beautiful castle in Normandy, and laid their seat there, and being in front, Ferrandon, who had set out from Evreux, stood in that castle; It happened that one day he had the powder of the cannons and the artillery revisited in a tower, so much so that while revisiting it, a lighted candle fell on the powder, which burned Ferrandon's whole face, of which he died, and two others with him. dessoubs du chastel, where he lodged a hundred men-at-arms; The Conestable and the Mareschal were louged on the other side of the Moutaigne, who held them very short, and every day the people of the Duke of Bourbon parleyed with them, that they surrendered, who for nothing would not do it, if the treasure of the King of Navarre, which was in his possession, was not brought to him and returned.  where he had three many rich crowns of gold and jewels, which had been the kings of France and sixty thousand francs of gold, as recognized by the ceulx de Léans. And now the Duc de Bourbon and the conestable sent to the king, at Paris, for the sceue of this treasure, of which, at the end of three days, the Sire de la Riviere came, hastily, for the covetousness of the said treasure. The Duc de la Riviere was very anxious that he should carry off the money, but the Duc de Bourbon, the Conestable, and the Mareschal would not let him go ahead; as long as they had room for the king's good. And so did the lords, that by assailing and waging a heavy war, in three days after, those of the chastel surrendered to the duke of Bourbon and the conestable, and gave to the lord de la Riviere the treasure which he so much desired. Then they razed the chastel, as they had done at Mortaigne, as the king commanded the lords, if they took it by force. And the Duc de Bourbon the Conestable and the Mareschal went to Reineville.

* Mortagne au perche (Orne)
** Evreux (Eure)
***Gavray (Manche)
**** Regnéville (Manche)

 
Engraving of the castle taken from the north of the banks of the Sienne.in "The castle of Gavray and the castle of Gavray" by Fernand VATIN - 1937 - Imprimerie Barbaroux

Notes & References :
(1) C. De Gerville « Les abbayes et les anciens châteaux de la Manche »
(2) G. Renault : « Annuaire……… »
(3) B. Beck : « Gavray, Hambye, Coutances » 1975
(4) G. Dupont-Ferrier : « Galliz regia ou état des officiers royaux des baillages et sénéchaussées de 1328 à 1515 » Paris 1942-1965 t.II
(5) « Chronique des quatre premiers Valois » éd. Siméon Luce PARIS 1862(Société de l’histoire de France)
(6) P. Contamine « La guerre de Cent Ans » Ed. PUFp.36
(7) « Chronique des règnes de Jean II et de Charles V » publiée par Delachenal t.1 Paris 1916
Cet évènement est repris également par deux chroniques latines citées par D.F. Secousse « Charles II, roi de Navarre » Paris 1755                                                                                                                                                                                               
(8) D.F. Secousse « Mémoires sur Charles II, roi de Navarre » Paris 1755 p.582
(9) Ce personnage, sieur de Saint-Sauveur, est en conflit permanent avec l’autorité française (Philippe VI et Jean le Bon). Il n’hésite pas à s’allier avec les Anglais pour assouvir sa vengeance, ils profiteront de son aide pour préparer leurs multiples incursions dans la région. Il leur léguera, à sa mort, son château.
(10) « Chronique normande du XIVème siècle » rédigée par un inconnu de 1369 à 1374, éditée par S. Luce, Recueil de la société d’histoire de France Paris 1882 p.117 et 118
(11) « Documents comptables des archives générales de Navarre concernant la Normandie (1328 à 1387) » recensés par M. Baudot, Répertoire périodique de documentation normande, cahiers Léopold Delisle, t. XIV fasc. 1, Caen 1965.1 p.88-89
(12) ibidem p.90-91
(13) P. Contamine « La guerre de Cent Ans » p.52-53
(14) « Comptes… » p. 69
(15) B.N. franc 26011 f 1415 (fichier Alfred Butot)
(16) L. Delisle : « Histoire du château et des sires de Saint-Sauveur -le-Vicomte » suivie des pièces justificatives p.127
(17) « Comptes … » p.69
(18) ibidem p.70
(19) « Comptes… » p.226-227
(20) cité par A. Dupont « Histoire…… » t. IV p.29-30 (Ms de D.L.N. vol. 7 p. 173-174, chambre des Comptes de Paris)
(21) ibidem p. 168 et 210
(22) Il s’agit du gascon Jean de Grailly, Captal de Buch. Un des vainqueurs de Poitiers aux côtés du Prince Noir, il deviendra le principal lieutenant et l’homme de confiance de Charles II de Navarre
(23) « Comptes… » p.227
(24) ibidem p.228
(25) ibidem p.255-256
(26) « Comptes… » p.64-65
(27) ibidem p.66
(28) id. note 93 – C’est à la suite de cet accord que Charles de Navarre laissa ses deux fils au roi de France pour être élevés avec la dauphin.
(29) « Documents comptables…… » p.104
(30) ibidem p.254-255
(31) ibidem p.256
(32) « Comptes… » P.256
(33) « Comptes… » p.60-61
(34) ibidem p.72
(35) E.G. Léonard, « Histoire de la Normandie », Paris 1972 p. 73
(36) P. Contamine, « La guerre de Cent Ans » p. 65
(37) cf. note 119
(38) G. Dupont « Histoire du Cotentin et de ses Isles » Paris 1873t. II p.425
(39) B.N. f. 26014 pièce 2202 (fichier A. Butot)
(40) D.N. Secousse « Mémoires… » pièces justificatives p.453-454
(41) B.N. Clairambault vol. 202 p.74 (fichier A. Butot)
(42) ibidem vol. 95 p.30
« Sachant suit que nous Fouquet Riboulé, seigneur d’Assé, confesse avoir eu et reçu de Jehan Le Flament, clerc des arbalestiers du Roy N.S. la somme de trois cenz dix frans en prest sur les gages de nous et vingt et neuf escuiers de notre compaignie (….)
Et id. vol.99 p.28
 (43) L. Delisle « Mand. De Charles V » t. II p.425
(44) B.N. fr. 26014 p. 2207 « résumé du fichier A. Butot »

Précédent